“You folks solved in no more than 2-3 days what the promoters claimed not to have been able to solve in 3 years!” – Researcher Ted Molczan
The Placard of the Roswell Slides: The Final Curtain
Several statements were made about it, some contradictory:
Tom Carey and Don Schmitt were interviewed, of the show’s expert presentations, Schmitt said:)
This will be part of the event, part of the program in May, that all of these analytical reports, all of the analyses, all of the main experts as well as the photographic experts who examined- there’s a placard, very fuzzy, that can not be legibly read by the naked eye, yet we’ve had everyone from Dr. David Rudiak, to Studio MacBeth, even the Photo Interpretation Department of the Pentagon, as well as Adobe have all told us that it’s beyond the pale, that it cannot be read, it is totally up to interpretation.So, we truly feel we have performed due diligence; we have done everything we can to substantiate and prove what is contained within these slides, whether it is something of a human malady or something truly extraordinary.
“We couldn’t make anything clearly out of the placard… several others, who did not have much luck.” – Adam Dew
“Nobody could read anything decisively in the placard, unfortunately. I am sure people will make attempts to do this going forward….. ” Adam Dew
MUMMIFIED BODY OF TWO YEAR OLD BOY
At the time of burial the body was clothed in a xxx-xxx cottonshirt. Burial wrappings consisted of these small cotton blankets.Xxxxxed by the X.I. Xxxxxx, San Francisco, California.Could if be “Cleared by the S.I.” (Security Inspector?)
More details and prop credits to follow.
Possibly since the rush release of the Roswell Slides placard deciphering announcement, Slide Box Media’s Adam Dew appears to have updated his website to reveal the placard text (below).
The above screenshot showing the meta data of the placard image file appears to suggest that the file and/or page was only just added to the website.
More details as they emerge.
- Nick Redfern speculates on possible origins of the photos of the child mummy
- Rich Renolds begins posting a response from Roswell Dream Team Slideshow support Anthony Bragalia
- Tim Printy’s newsletter SUNlite recently focused on the Roswell Slides
- Who Forted chime in on the big May 5th reveal
- Frank Warren of UFO Chronicles Comments on the Placard Deciphering…
Setting aside the placard for a moment the clear image that Dolan sent to C2C–oops (which I’m guessing the promoters of the hokum weren’t to happy about) was the (first) nail in the coffin. The pristine images weren’t displayed during the gig as promised; they were all edited and in a blue cast–why?! The placard describing what the exhibit was/is was bleached out! Why?!
One need not be a rocket scientist to deduce from the image that it is of a museum and or similar type exhibit/display with other displays visible . . . why were these facts never mentioned from those that had seen the images in their pristine, high resolution condition before hand?!
How do we rule out malicious intent with this damning evidence on the table?
At the moment I can’t think of a worse disgrace suffered by Ufology; this is Ufology’s Piltdown Man, orchestrated by Ufology’s PT Barnum & friends!
Jaime Maussan, the journalist who organised the unveiling, replied: …
“I lost about $100 thousand in the event, even though we had six thousand people in the auditorium and a few thousand watching on the Internet.